Re: [PATCH 5.11] block: optimise for_each_bvec() advance

[Pavel Begunkov]

On 24/11/2020 11:37, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:21:23AM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>> Because of how for_each_bvec() works it never advances across multiple
>> entries at a time, so bvec_iter_advance() is an overkill. Add
>> specialised bvec_iter_advance_single() that is faster. It also handles
>> zero-len bvecs, so can kill bvec_iter_skip_zero_bvec().
>>
[...]
> 
> Looks fine,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks Ming

-- 
Pavel Begunkov