Re: [PATCH 2/6] timekeeping: add missed kernel-doc marks for 'tkf'

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, Nov 13 2020 at 15:24, Alex Shi wrote:

> Fix the kernel-doc markup and remove the following warning:
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c:415: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'tkf' not described in 'update_fast_timekeeper'
> kernel/time/timekeeping.c:464: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'tkf' not described in '__ktime_get_fast_ns'
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index daa0ff017819..d0f7cd1b8823 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ static inline u64 timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(const struct tk_read_base *tkr, u64 c
>  /**
>   * update_fast_timekeeper - Update the fast and NMI safe monotonic timekeeper.
>   * @tkr: Timekeeping readout base from which we take the update
> + * @tkf: NMI safe timekeeper
>   *
>   * We want to use this from any context including NMI and tracing /
>   * instrumenting the timekeeping code itself.
> @@ -430,6 +431,7 @@ static void update_fast_timekeeper(const struct tk_read_base *tkr,
>  
>  /**
>   * ktime_get_mono_fast_ns - Fast NMI safe access to clock monotonic
> + * @tkf: NMI safe timekeeper
>   *
>   * This timestamp is not guaranteed to be monotonic across an update.
>   * The timestamp is calculated by:

That's wrong. The documentation is for ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() which
does not have an argument, but due to an oversight the documentation is
now above __ktime_get_mono_fast_ns() which takes an argument.

I'm fixing it up.