Re: [PATCH] lib: vsprintf: Avoid 32-bit truncation in vsscanf number parsing

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Nov 12 2020 - 12:04:32 EST


On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:46:46 +0000
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> See this thread from 2014 where the field width problem was raised and
> explained:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1401.1/03443.html
>
> and the reply from Linus Torvalds that was against fixing field width
> handling:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1401.1/03488.html

Thanks for the pointers, but note, that references to older emails should
use https://lore.kernel.org/ as these links format the output really
horribly.

>
> which I assume is why the field handling wasn't unoptimized to be
> strictly correct.
>
> Nevertheless, I see no reason not to remove avoidable inconsistencies
> from the current design.

Yes, but perhaps its time to fix the real problem and not just add
band-aids. That thread is over 6 years old (the email was from Jan 14, 2014)

$ git diff `git rev-list --before 'Jan 14 2014' HEAD --max-count=1` |
grep '^+' | grep sscanf | wc -l
622

There's been over 600 new additions of sscanf(). Now is the time to just
fix it correctly.

-- Steve