Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: prevent gup_fast from racing with COW during fork

From: Peter Xu
Date: Wed Nov 11 2020 - 14:59:29 EST


On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 07:44:09PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Since commit 70e806e4e645 ("mm: Do early cow for pinned pages during
> fork() for ptes") pages under a FOLL_PIN will not be write protected
> during COW for fork. This means that pages returned from
> pin_user_pages(FOLL_WRITE) should not become write protected while the pin
> is active.
>
> However, there is a small race where get_user_pages_fast(FOLL_PIN) can
> establish a FOLL_PIN at the same time copy_present_page() is write
> protecting it:
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> get_user_pages_fast()
> internal_get_user_pages_fast()
> copy_page_range()
> pte_alloc_map_lock()
> copy_present_page()
> atomic_read(has_pinned) == 0
> page_maybe_dma_pinned() == false
> atomic_set(has_pinned, 1);
> gup_pgd_range()
> gup_pte_range()
> pte_t pte = gup_get_pte(ptep)
> pte_access_permitted(pte)
> try_grab_compound_head()
> pte = pte_wrprotect(pte)
> set_pte_at();
> pte_unmap_unlock()
> // GUP now returns with a write protected page
>
> The first attempt to resolve this by using the write protect caused
> problems (and was missing a barrrier), see commit f3c64eda3e50 ("mm: avoid
> early COW write protect games during fork()")
>
> Instead wrap copy_p4d_range() with the write side of a seqcount and check
> the read side around gup_pgd_range(). If there is a collision then
> get_user_pages_fast() fails and falls back to slow GUP.
>
> Slow GUP is safe against this race because copy_page_range() is only
> called while holding the exclusive side of the mmap_lock on the src
> mm_struct.
>
> Fixes: f3c64eda3e50 ("mm: avoid early COW write protect games during fork()")
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wi=iCnYCARbPGjkVJu9eyYeZ13N64tZYLdOB8CP5Q_PLw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Peter Xu