Re: [PATCH 5/8] cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency setting

[Viresh Kumar]

On 05-11-20, 12:55, Ionela Voinescu wrote:
> Considering only the currently supported coordination types (ANY, HW,
> NONE), this change only makes a difference for the ANY type, when
> policy->cpu is hotplugged out. In that case the new policy->cpu will
> be different from ((struct cppc_cpudata *)policy->driver_data)->cpu.
> 
> While in this case the controls of *ANY* CPU could be used to drive
> frequency changes, it's more consistent to use policy->cpu as the
> leading CPU, as used in all other cppc_cpufreq functions. Additionally,
> the debug prints in cppc_set_perf() would no longer create confusion
> when referring to a CPU that is hotplugged out.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index ac95b4424a2e..fd2daeb59b49 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  
>  {
>  	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
> +	unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
>  	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
>  	u32 desired_perf;
>  	int ret = 0;
> @@ -164,12 +165,12 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  	freqs.new = target_freq;
>  
>  	cpufreq_freq_transition_begin(policy, &freqs);
> -	ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu_data->cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls);
> +	ret = cppc_set_perf(cpu, &cpu_data->perf_ctrls);
>  	cpufreq_freq_transition_end(policy, &freqs, ret != 0);
>  
>  	if (ret)
>  		pr_debug("Failed to set target on CPU:%d. ret:%d\n",
> -			 cpu_data->cpu, ret);
> +			 cpu, ret);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh