Re: [PATCH v4 00/17] Add VFIO mediated device support and DEV-MSI support for the idxd driver

From: Raj, Ashok
Date: Fri Oct 30 2020 - 15:24:38 EST


On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:17:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:13:48PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10/30/2020 11:58 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:50:47AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> > > > .../ABI/stable/sysfs-driver-dma-idxd | 6 +
> > > > Documentation/driver-api/vfio/mdev-idxd.rst | 404 ++++++
> > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig | 9 +
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/Makefile | 2 +
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/cdev.c | 6 +-
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/device.c | 294 ++++-
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.h | 67 +-
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/init.c | 86 ++
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c | 6 +-
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/mdev.c | 1121 +++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/dma/idxd/mdev.h | 116 ++
> > >
> > > Again, a subsytem driver belongs in the directory hierarchy of the
> > > subsystem, not in other random places. All this mdev stuff belongs
> > > under drivers/vfio
> >
> > Alex seems to have disagreed last time....
> > https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20200917113016.425dcde7@xxxxxxx/
>
> Nobody else in the kernel is splitting subsystems up anymore
>
> > And I do agree with his perspective. The mdev is an extension of the PF
> > driver. It's a bit awkward to be a stand alone mdev driver under vfio/mdev/.
>
> By this logic we'd have giagantic drivers under drivers/ethernet
> touching netdev, rdma, scsi, vdpa, etc just because that is where the
> PF driver came from.

What makes you think this is providing services like scsi/rdma/vdpa etc.. ?

for DSA this playes the exact same role, not a different function
as you highlight above. these mdev's are creating DSA for virtualization
use. They aren't providing a completely different role or subsystem per-se.

Cheers,
Ashok