Re: [PATCH v39 15/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_PROVISION

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Sat Oct 24 2020 - 11:47:44 EST


On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 4:34 AM Jarkko Sakkinen <kernel.org@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 07:19:05AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 10/23/20 3:17 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 02:19:26PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > >> On 10/2/20 9:50 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > >>> + * Failure to explicitly request access to a restricted attribute will cause
> > >>> + * sgx_ioc_enclave_init() to fail. Currently, the only restricted attribute
> > >>> + * is access to the PROVISION_KEY.
> > >> Could we also justify why access is restricted, please? Maybe:
> > >>
> > >> Access is restricted because PROVISION_KEY is burned uniquely
> > >> into each each processor, making it a perfect unique identifier
> > >> with privacy and fingerprinting implications.
> > >>
> > >> Are there any other reasons for doing it this way?
> > > AFAIK, if I interperet the SDM correctl, PROVISION_KEY and
> > > PROVISION_SEALING_KEY also have random salt added, i.e. they change
> > > every boot cycle.
> > >
> > > There is "RAND = yes" on those keys in Table 40-64 of Intel SDM volume
> > > 3D :-)
> >
> > Does that mean there are no privacy implications from access to the
> > provisioning keys? If that's true, why do we need a separate permission
> > framework for creating provisioning enclaves?
>
> As I've understood it, the key material for those keys is not even
> required in the current SGX architecture, it was used in the legacy EPID
> scheme, but the attribute itself is useful.
>
> Let's assume that we have some sort of quoting enclave Q, which guards a
> public key pair, which signs quotes of other enclaves. Let's assume we
> have an attestation server A, which will enable some capabilities [*],
> if it receives a quote signed with that public key pair.
>
> 1. E gets the report key with EGETKEY.
> 2. E constructs REPORTDATA (37.16) and TARGETINFO (37.17) structures.
> The former describes the enclaves contents and attributes and latter
> the target, i.e. Q in this artitificial example.
> 3. E calls EREPORT to generate a structure called REPORT MAC'd with the
> *targets* report key. It knows, which key to usue from REPORTDATA.
> 4. The runtime will then pass this to Q.
> 5. Q will check if ATTRIBUTE.PROVISION_KEY is set. If it is, Q will
> know that the enclave is allowed to get attested. Then it will
> sign the report with the guarded public key pair and send it to
> the attestation server.

I think you have this a little bit off. AIUI E won't have
ATTRIBUTE.PROVISION_KEY set -- Q will. Q uses the provisioning key to
convince an Intel server that it's running on a genuine Intel CPU, and
the Intel server will return a signed certificate that Q can chain off
of to generate attestations for E.

Dave, I would rephrase what you're saying a bit. The PROVISION_KEY
attribute allows enclaves to access keys that are unique to a
processor and unchangeable. Unlike other SGX keys, these keys are not
affected by OWNER_EPOCH changes and therefore cannot be reset.

--Andy