RE: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_sas: use spin_lock() in hard IRQ

From: Tianxianting
Date: Thu Oct 22 2020 - 00:40:28 EST


Thanks,
Do you mean Megasas raid can be used in m68k arch?

-----Original Message-----
From: Finn Thain [mailto:fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:25 AM
To: tianxianting (RD) <tian.xianting@xxxxxxx>
Cc: kashyap.desai@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sumit.saxena@xxxxxxxxxxxx; shivasharan.srikanteshwara@xxxxxxxxxxxx; jejb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx; megaraidlinux.pdl@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_sas: use spin_lock() in hard IRQ

On Wed, 21 Oct 2020, Xianting Tian wrote:

> Since we already in hard IRQ context when running megasas_isr(),

On m68k, hard irq context does not mean interrupts are disabled. Are there no other architectures in that category?

> so use spin_lock() is enough, which is faster than spin_lock_irqsave().
>

Is that measurable?

> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <tian.xianting@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> index 2b7e7b5f3..bd186254d 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> @@ -3977,15 +3977,14 @@ static irqreturn_t megasas_isr(int irq, void
> *devp) {
> struct megasas_irq_context *irq_context = devp;
> struct megasas_instance *instance = irq_context->instance;
> - unsigned long flags;
> irqreturn_t rc;
>
> if (atomic_read(&instance->fw_reset_no_pci_access))
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&instance->hba_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock(&instance->hba_lock);
> rc = megasas_deplete_reply_queue(instance, DID_OK);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&instance->hba_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock(&instance->hba_lock);
>
> return rc;
> }
>