Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/boot/64: Explicitly map boot_params and command line

[Arvind Sankar]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 04:04:01PM -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > Commits
> > 
> >   ca0e22d4f011 ("x86/boot/compressed/64: Always switch to own page table")
> >   8570978ea030 ("x86/boot/compressed/64: Don't pre-map memory in KASLR code")
> > 
> > set up a new page table in the decompressor stub, but without explicit
> > mappings for boot_params and the kernel command line, relying on the #PF
> > handler instead.
> > 
> > This is fragile, as boot_params and the command line mappings are
> > required for the main kernel. If EARLY_PRINTK and RANDOMIZE_BASE are
> > disabled, a QEMU/OVMF boot never accesses the command line in the
> > decompressor stub, and so it never gets mapped. The main kernel accesses
> > it from the identity mapping if AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT is enabled, and will
> > crash.
> > 
> > Fix this by adding back the explicit mapping of boot_params and the
> > command line.
> > 
> > Note: the changes also removed the explicit mapping of the main kernel,
> > with the result that .bss and .brk may not be in the identity mapping,
> > but those don't get accessed by the main kernel before it switches to
> > its own page tables.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S      |  3 +++
> >  arch/x86/boot/compressed/ident_map_64.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> > index 1c80f1738fd9..3976b4e92e1b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
> > @@ -544,6 +544,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL_NOALIGN(.Lrelocated)
> >  	pushq	%rsi
> >  	call	set_sev_encryption_mask
> >  	call	load_stage2_idt
> > +	/* Pass boot_params to initialize_identity_maps */
> > +	popq	%rdi
> > +	pushq	%rdi
> 
> Any reason why you're not doing
> 
> 	movq    (%rsp), %rdi
> 
> here instead?
> 

No real reason. This will disappear anyway in the cleanup patch.