[PATCH] ring-buffer: Returns 0 on success from ring_buffer_resize()

From: Qiujun Huang
Date: Mon Oct 19 2020 - 10:22:59 EST


We don't need to check the new buffer size, and the return value
had confused resize_buffer_duplicate_size().
...
ret = ring_buffer_resize(trace_buf->buffer,
per_cpu_ptr(size_buf->data,cpu_id)->entries, cpu_id);
if (ret == 0)
per_cpu_ptr(trace_buf->data, cpu_id)->entries =
per_cpu_ptr(size_buf->data, cpu_id)->entries;
...

Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 93ef0ab6ea20..3b5f8ec3781e 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1952,18 +1952,18 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size,
{
struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
unsigned long nr_pages;
- int cpu, err = 0;
+ int cpu, err;

/*
* Always succeed at resizing a non-existent buffer:
*/
if (!buffer)
- return size;
+ return 0;

/* Make sure the requested buffer exists */
if (cpu_id != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS &&
!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_id, buffer->cpumask))
- return size;
+ return 0;

nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);

@@ -2119,7 +2119,7 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct trace_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size,
}

mutex_unlock(&buffer->mutex);
- return size;
+ return 0;

out_err:
for_each_buffer_cpu(buffer, cpu) {
--
2.17.1