Re: [PATCH] qla2xxx: Return EBUSY on fcport deletion

[Daniel Wagner]

On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 09:07:15AM -0700, Arun Easi wrote:
> This does not appear to be cut against the latest for-next/staging; "rval" 
> is not used there for the initial set of returns.

Indeed, forgot to use staging. It's against queue. Let me update it.

> Anyway, returning EBUSY is the right way to go.

Thanks for the confirmation.

Daniel