Re: [PATCH v2] misc: Kconfig: add a new dependency for HISI_HIKEY_USB

From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Date: Thu Oct 08 2020 - 02:28:32 EST


Em Thu, 8 Oct 2020 08:14:43 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 07:30:27AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > As warned by Randy:
> >
> > on x86_64:
> > CONFIG_USB_ROLE_SWITCH=m
> > and HISI_HIKEY_USB=y.
> >
> > ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `hisi_hikey_usb_remove':
> > hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0x61): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_unregister'
> > ld: hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xa4): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_put'
> > ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `hub_usb_role_switch_set':
> > hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xd3): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_get_drvdata'
> > ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `relay_set_role_switch':
> > hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0x54d): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_set_role'
> > ld: drivers/misc/hisi_hikey_usb.o: in function `hisi_hikey_usb_probe':
> > hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0x8a5): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_get'
> > ld: hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xa08): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_register'
> > ld: hisi_hikey_usb.c:(.text+0xa6e): undefined reference to `usb_role_switch_put'
> >
> > Make it dependent on CONFIG_USB_ROLE_SWITCH.
> >
> > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/misc/Kconfig | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > index e19e1dcceb41..d5ce8082b0a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ config PVPANIC
> > config HISI_HIKEY_USB
> > tristate "USB GPIO Hub on HiSilicon Hikey 960/970 Platform"
> > depends on (OF && GPIOLIB) || COMPILE_TEST
> > + depends on USB_ROLE_SWITCH
> > help
> > If you say yes here this adds support for the on-board USB GPIO hub
> > found on HiKey 960/970 boards, which is necessary to support
>
> I can't rebase my tree, so can you send the fix-up patch instead, with
> the proper "reported-by:"?

Sent. You may need to adjust the Fixes: line there, in order to
point to the right changeset on your tree.

Thanks,
Mauro