Re: [PATCH rdma-next v3 0/5] Cleanup restrack code

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:11:01PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Changelog:
> v3:
>  * Removed the mlx4 SR-IOV patch in favour of more robust fix that not needed in
>    this series.
>  * Cut the eroginal series to already reviewed and standalone patches.
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20200907122156.478360-1-leon@xxxxxxxxxx/
>  * Added new patch to fix mlx4 failure on SR-IOV, it didn't have port set.
>  * Changed "RDMA/cma: Delete from restrack DB after successful destroy" patch.
> v1:
>  * Fixed rebase error, deleted second assignment of qp_type.
>  * Rebased code on latests rdma-next, the changes in cma.c caused to change
>    in patch "RDMA/cma: Delete from restrack DB after successful destroy".
>  * Dropped patch of port assignment, it is already done as part of this
>    series.
>  * I didn't add @calller description, regular users should not use _named() funciton.
>  * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200830101436.108487-1-leon@xxxxxxxxxx
> v0: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824104415.1090901-1-leon@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> Leon Romanovsky (5):
>   RDMA/cma: Delete from restrack DB after successful destroy
>   RDMA/mlx5: Don't call to restrack recursively
>   RDMA/restrack: Count references to the verbs objects
>   RDMA/restrack: Simplify restrack tracking in kernel flows
>   RDMA/restrack: Improve readability in task name management

Applied to for-next, thanks

Jason