Re: [PATCH 0/3] clk: keystone: some minor fixes

[santosh . shilimkar]

On 9/10/20 2:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxxxxxx (2020-09-08 10:19:32)
> > On 9/7/20 1:57 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > > Hi Santosh,
> > >
> > > This series contains a few fixes for the TI SCI clock driver.
> > > - Patch #1 is a clear bug fix, where we missed to parse assigned-clock
> > >     data properly to detect which clocks are in use on the SoC.
> > > - Patch #2 is a performance improvement patch which avoids some
> > >     unnecessary round trips to firmware side while setting clock
> > >     frequency.
> > > - Patch #3 fixes some issues with set_rate passed to firmware, where the
> > >     parameters are too strict; namely, firmware fails to handle some cases
> > >     properly if min,tgt,max values for a clock rate are exactly the same
> > >     value. Yeah, the firmware is quite weird here but nothing much else we
> > >     can do from kernel side other than this....
> > Looks fine to me Tero.
> >
> > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Hi Stephen, Mike,
> > Can you please pick these fixes via clk tree ?
>
> Sure. I assume this is -next material and not critical fixes.
Yep.