Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)

[Randy Dunlap]

On 7/21/20 10:41 AM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 20 July 2020 22:11
>> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Next Mailing List <linux-
>> next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-scsi <linux-
>> scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Santosh Yaraganavi <santosh.sy@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
>> Vinayak Holikatti <h.vinayak@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Alim Akhtar
>> <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Seungwon Jeon <essuuj@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 20 (scsi/ufs/exynos)
>>
>> On 7/20/20 2:42 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20200717:
>>>
>>
>> on x86_64:
>>
>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for PHY_SAMSUNG_UFS
>>   Depends on [n]: OF [=n] && (ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
>>   Selected by [y]:
>>   - SCSI_UFS_EXYNOS [=y] && SCSI_LOWLEVEL [=y] && SCSI [=y] &&
>> SCSI_UFSHCD_PLATFORM [=y] && (ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST [=y])
>>
> Thanks, will post a patch shortly.

Hi Alim,
I am still seeing this in linux-next of 20200909.
Was there a patch posted that I missed and is not applied anywhere yet?


>> There are no build errors since <linux/of.h> provides stubs for functions when
>> CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
>>
>> But new warnings are not OK.
>>
>> thanks.
>> --
>> ~Randy
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 

thanks.
-- 
~Randy