Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] leds: pwm: Make automatic labels work
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Wed Sep 09 2020 - 05:27:32 EST
Hi!
> > > Besides: those suggestions are obviously valid for new bindings. What
> > > about old bindings (.txt), which had no explicit SPDX tag or license note
> > > before? What license would apply there? Is the .yaml file technically
> > > new, when it was mostly just converted from .txt?
> >
> > If it is based on previous .txt binding, you have to respect previous
> > author's license. That probably means GPL-2.0 only.
>
> Probably?
I have not checked exact licensing situation of that text, have not
decided if it was copyrightable in the first place, and am not a
lawyer.
So... probably :-).
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature