Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf' value in cppc_perf_caps struct

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Jul 01 2020 - 08:16:51 EST


On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 6:52 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 01-07-20, 12:20, Xin Hao wrote:
> > The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get
> > 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use
> > 'caps->highest_perf' instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> > index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
> > if (!max_khz)
> > max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
> > mul = max_khz;
> > - div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
> > + div = caps->highest_perf;
> > }
> > return (u64)perf * mul / div;
> > }
> > @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
> > } else {
> > if (!max_khz)
> > max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
> > - mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
> > + mul = caps->highest_perf;
> > div = max_khz;
> > }
>
> Applied. Thanks.

I applied the previous cppc_cpufreq patch, hopefully it will not clash
with this one.

Are you going to take care of this driver going forward?