Re: [PATCH 2/6] exec: simplify the compat syscall handling

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Mon Jun 15 2020 - 11:09:34 EST


On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> How about this one:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> index 3d8d70d3896c..0ce15807cf54 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
> #undef __SYSCALL_X32
> #undef __SYSCALL_COMMON
>
> +#define __x32_sys_execve __x64_sys_execve
> +#define __x32_sys_execveat __x64_sys_execveat
> +


arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:19:26: error: â__x64_sys_execveâ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean â__x32_sys_execveâ?
19 | #define __x32_sys_execve __x64_sys_execve
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:22:39: note: in expansion of macro â__x32_sys_execveâ
22 | #define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) [nr] = __x32_##sym,
| ^~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:344:1: note: in expansion of macro â__SYSCALL_X32â
344 | __SYSCALL_X32(520, sys_execve)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:20:28: error: â__x64_sys_execveatâ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean â__x32_sys_execveatâ?
20 | #define __x32_sys_execveat __x64_sys_execveat
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c:22:39: note: in expansion of macro â__x32_sys_execveatâ
22 | #define __SYSCALL_X32(nr, sym) [nr] = __x32_##sym,
| ^~~~~~
./arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:369:1: note: in expansion of macro â__SYSCALL_X32â
369 | __SYSCALL_X32(545, sys_execveat)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:281: arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:497: arch/x86/entry] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
kernel/exit.o: warning: objtool: __x64_sys_exit_group()+0x14: unreachable instruction
make: *** [Makefile:1764: arch/x86] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....