Re: [PATCH 05/14] mm: workingset: let cache workingset challenge anon

[Johannes Weiner]

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:19:58PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 2020ë 6ì 5ì (ê) ìì 12:06, Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>ëì ìì:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 03:35:27PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > On 6/1/20 10:44 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > > From a8faceabc1454dfd878caee2a8422493d937a394 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:04:09 -0400
> > > > Subject: [PATCH] mm: workingset: let cache workingset challenge anon fix
> > >
> > > Looks like the whole series is now in mainline (that was quick!) without this
> > > followup? As such it won't be squashed so perhaps the subject should be more
> > > "standalone" now, description referencing commit 34e58cac6d8f ("mm: workingset:
> > > let cache workingset challenge anon"), possibly with Fixes: tag etc...
> >
> > Yep, I'll send a stand-alone version of this. It was a bit fat to get
> > squashed last minute anyway, and I don't mind having a bit of extra
> > time to quantify the actual impact of this delta.
> 
> Hello, Johannes.
> 
> Now, a week has passed. I hope that this patch is merged as soon as possible,
> since my WIP patchset depends on this patch. How about trying to merge
> this patch now? If you don't mind, I could send it on your behalf.

I didn't realize you directly depended on it, my apologies.

Do you depend on it code-wise or do you have test case that shows a
the difference?

Here is the latest version again, you can include it in your patch
series until we get it merged. But I think we should be able to merge
it as a follow-up fix into 5.8 still.

---