Re: [RFC,net-next, 2/5] vrf: track associations between VRF devices and tables

[Andrea Mayer]

Hi Stephen,
thanks for your questions.

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > +
> > +	 * Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated
> > +	 * from a table with exactly two associated vrfs.
> > +	 */
> > +	int shared_tables;
> 
> Should this be unsigned?
> Should it be a fixed size?

Yes. I think an u32 would be reasonable for the shared_table.
What do you think?

Andrea