Re: [RFC,net-next, 3/5] vrf: add sysctl parameter for strict mode

From: Jakub Kicinski
Date: Fri Jun 12 2020 - 13:52:32 EST


On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 18:49:35 +0200 Andrea Mayer wrote:
> Add net.vrf.strict_mode sysctl parameter.
>
> When net.vrf.strict_mode=0 (default) it is possible to associate multiple
> VRF devices to the same table. Conversely, when net.vrf.strict_mode=1 a
> table can be associated to a single VRF device.
>
> When switching from net.vrf.strict_mode=0 to net.vrf.strict_mode=1, a check
> is performed to verify that all tables have at most one VRF associated,
> otherwise the switch is not allowed.
>
> The net.vrf.strict_mode parameter is per network namespace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@xxxxxxxxxxx>

drivers/net/vrf.c:1771:49: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces)
drivers/net/vrf.c:1771:49: expected void *
drivers/net/vrf.c:1771:49: got void [noderef] <asn:1> *buffer
drivers/net/vrf.c:1785:35: warning: incorrect type in initializer (incompatible argument 3 (different address spaces))
drivers/net/vrf.c:1785:35: expected int ( [usertype] *proc_handler )( ... )
drivers/net/vrf.c:1785:35: got int ( * )( ... )