[PATCH 4/4] rcu: use gp_seq instead of rcu_gp_seq for consistency

From: Wei Yang
Date: Thu Jun 11 2020 - 22:08:48 EST


Commit de30ad512a66 ("rcu: Introduce grace-period sequence numbers")
introduce gp_seq in rcu_state/rcu_node/rcu_data. And this field in last
two structure track the one in first.

While the comment use rcu_gp_seq which is a little misleading for
audience. Let's use the exact name gp_seq for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 512829eed545..3356842bc185 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct rcu_node {
raw_spinlock_t __private lock; /* Root rcu_node's lock protects */
/* some rcu_state fields as well as */
/* following. */
- unsigned long gp_seq; /* Track rsp->rcu_gp_seq. */
+ unsigned long gp_seq; /* Track rsp->gp_seq. */
unsigned long gp_seq_needed; /* Track furthest future GP request. */
unsigned long completedqs; /* All QSes done for this node. */
unsigned long qsmask; /* CPUs or groups that need to switch in */
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ union rcu_noqs {
/* Per-CPU data for read-copy update. */
struct rcu_data {
/* 1) quiescent-state and grace-period handling : */
- unsigned long gp_seq; /* Track rsp->rcu_gp_seq counter. */
+ unsigned long gp_seq; /* Track rsp->gp_seq. */
unsigned long gp_seq_needed; /* Track furthest future GP request. */
union rcu_noqs cpu_no_qs; /* No QSes yet for this CPU. */
bool core_needs_qs; /* Core waits for quiesc state. */
--
2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)