Re: [PATCH] .clang-format: update column limit

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 12:03 +0200, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 7:13 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ii think this is a not a good change.
> > 
> > If you read the commit log you provided, it ways
> > "staying withing 80 columns is certainly still _preferred_"
> 
> Yes, but the related email discussions were not about establishing a
> new hard limit, but about avoiding such hard limits for
> historical/technical reasons.

Exactly.  So don't set a new hard limit of 100.

This would _always_ wrap lines to 100 columns when
80 columns is still preferred.

Imagine using a 100 column limit where a statement still
fits on 2 lines.  Now imagine the same statement wrapped
at 80 columns still fitting on 2 lines.

Which would you prefer and why?