Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] bits: Add tests of GENMASK

[Rikard Falkeborn]

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 10:35 PM Rikard Falkeborn
> <rikard.falkeborn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add tests of GENMASK and GENMASK_ULL.
> >
> > A few test cases that should fail compilation are provided under ifdef.
> 
> It doesn't hurt to mention the name of the #ifdef here.
> 
> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/test_bits.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * Test cases for functions and macrso in bits.h
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <kunit/test.h>
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> > +
> > +
> > +void genmask_test(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 1ul, GENMASK(0, 0));
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 3ul, GENMASK(1, 0));
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 6ul, GENMASK(2, 1));
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0xFFFFFFFFul, GENMASK(31, 0));
> > +
> > +#ifdef TEST_BITS_COMPILE
> 
> "#ifdef TEST_GENMASK_FAILURES"?

Much better! I'll update that (and add the ifdef to the commit message)
for v3.

Thanks

Rikard
> 
> > +       /* these should fail compilation */
> > +       GENMASK(0, 1);
> > +       GENMASK(0, 10);
> > +       GENMASK(9, 10);
> > +#endif
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> -- 
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds