Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Add support for RESOLVE_MAYEXEC

From: Christian Brauner
Date: Thu Apr 30 2020 - 04:07:57 EST


On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:54:29AM +1000, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2020-04-28, MickaÃl SalaÃn <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The goal of this patch series is to enable to control script execution
> > with interpreters help. A new RESOLVE_MAYEXEC flag, usable through
> > openat2(2), is added to enable userspace script interpreter to delegate
> > to the kernel (and thus the system security policy) the permission to
> > interpret/execute scripts or other files containing what can be seen as
> > commands.
> >
> > This third patch series mainly differ from the previous one by relying
> > on the new openat2(2) system call to get rid of the undefined behavior
> > of the open(2) flags. Thus, the previous O_MAYEXEC flag is now replaced
> > with the new RESOLVE_MAYEXEC flag and benefits from the openat2(2)
> > strict check of this kind of flags.
>
> My only strong upfront objection is with this being a RESOLVE_ flag.
>
> RESOLVE_ flags have a specific meaning (they generally apply to all
> components, and affect the rules of path resolution). RESOLVE_MAYEXEC
> does neither of these things and so seems out of place among the other
> RESOLVE_ flags.
>
> I would argue this should be an O_ flag, but not supported for the

I agree.

Christian