Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2] f2fs: Avoid double lock for cp_rwsem during checkpoint

[Markus Elfring]

> â This results in deadlock as
> iput() tries to hold cp_rwsem, which is already held at the
> beginning by checkpoint->block_operations().

Will another imperative wording become helpful besides the provided information
for this change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=6a8b55ed4056ea5559ebe4f6a4b247f627870d4c#n151

Would you like to add the tag âFixesâ because of adjustments
for the data synchronisation?

Regards,
Markus