Re: b276527539 ("staging: most: move core files out of the staging .."): [ 12.247349] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Apr 24 2020 - 06:55:22 EST


On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:21:05AM +0000, Christian.Gromm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 12:16 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > know the content is safe
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:41:36AM +0000,
> > Christian.Gromm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2020-03-29 at 21:39 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> > > > know the content is safe
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > >
> > > > 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad
> > > > commit is
> > > >
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
> > > > staging-next
> > > >
> > > > commit b276527539188f1f61c082ebef27803db93e536d
> > > > Author: Christian Gromm <christian.gromm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > AuthorDate: Tue Mar 10 14:02:40 2020 +0100
> > > > Commit: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > CommitDate: Tue Mar 24 13:42:44 2020 +0100
> > > >
> > > > staging: most: move core files out of the staging area
> > > >
> > > > This patch moves the core module to the /drivers/most
> > > > directory
> > > > and makes all necessary changes in order to not break the
> > > > build.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Gromm <christian.gromm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > Link:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/1583845362-26707-2-git-send-email-christian.gromm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 22dd4acc80 Staging: speakup: Add identifier name to function
> > > > declaration arguments.
> > > > b276527539 staging: most: move core files out of the staging
> > > > area
> > > > e681bb287f staging: vt6656: Use DIV_ROUND_UP macro instead of
> > > > specific code
> > > > +-------------------------------------------------------+------
> > > > ----
> > > > --+------------+------------+
> > > > > |
> > > > > 22dd4acc80
> > > > > > b276527539 | e681bb287f |
> > > > +-------------------------------------------------------+------
> > > > ----
> > > > --+------------+------------+
> > > > > boot_successes |
> > > > > 26 | 0 | 0 |
> > > > > boot_failures |
> > > > > 8 | 11 | 11 |
> > > > > WARNING:possible_circular_locking_dependency_detected |
> > > > > 8 | | |
> > > > > BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address |
> > > > > 0 | 11 | 11 |
> > > > > Oops:#[##] |
> > > > > 0 | 11 | 11 |
> > > > > EIP:__list_add_valid |
> > > > > 0 | 11 | 11 |
> > > > > Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception |
> > > > > 0 | 11 | 11 |
> > > > +-------------------------------------------------------+------
> > > > ----
> > > > --+------------+------------+
> > > >
> > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > [ 12.242090] no options.
> > > > [ 12.245364] FPGA DOWNLOAD --->
> > > > [ 12.245723] FPGA image file name: xlinx_fpga_firmware.bit
> > > > [ 12.246548] GPIO INIT FAIL!!
> > > > [ 12.246995] most_sound: init()
> > > > [ 12.247349] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> > >
> > > The init order of the modules is wrong in case the driver is
> > > being built in-tree.
> > >
> > > The init function of module most_sound is called before the
> > > core itself is being initialized.
> > >
> > > [ 5.179189] most_sound: init()
> > > [ 5.180205] mostcore: __init()
> > >
> > > Hence the list used in the core to store and track the
> > > registered components has not been initialized with
> > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&comp_list) by the time the sound module
> > > tries to register itself with the core.
> > >
> > > The Kconfig of most_sound, however, has a dependency to
> > > MOST. How can the build system be forced to initialize the
> > > core module first?
> >
> > Linker order is the thing here.
> >
> > You can mess with the init levels here, and use subsys_initcall() for
> > mostcore, will that fix it?
>
> I already gave it a try and it works. But is it ok to use the
> subsys_initcall() function when the driver is being built as a
> module?

Yes, that works the same, see it's use elsewhere in the kernel tree, and
for what it "degrades to" if the file is being built as a module.

thanks,

greg k-h