Re: [PATCH 1/2] thermal: core: Move thermal_cdev_update next to updated=false

From: Zhang Rui
Date: Fri Apr 10 2020 - 22:56:09 EST


On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:26 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/04/2020 12:14, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Hi, Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, 2020-04-09 at 17:15 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > The call to the thermal_cdev_update() function is done after
> > > browsing
> > > the thermal instances which sets the updated flag by browsing
> > > them
> > > again.
> > >
> > > Instead of doing this, let's move the call right after setting
> > > the
> > > cooling device 'updated' flag as it is done in the other
> > > governors.
> >
> > The reason we do this in two steps is that we want to avoid
> > redundant
> > cooling device state changes.
> >
> > Further more, I think it is better to move the thermal_cdev_update
> > out
> > of .throllte() callback, to thermal_zone_device_update(). So that
> > we do
> > not need to update the cooling device for each trip point.
> >
> > is there any specific reason we need to do thermal_cdev_update()
> > for
> > every potential change?
>
> I agree we can go further and move the cooling device update in the
> thermal_zone_device_update() by letting the throttle callback let us
> know an update is needed with the return value.
>
> Makes sense to provide more changes on top of those two patches ?

Hmmm, without the update flag, we can only updating all the cooling
devices blindly. And this is time consuming for some cooling devices.

thanks,
rui

>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c | 10 +---------
> > > drivers/thermal/step_wise.c | 10 +---------
> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
> > > b/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
> > > index 991a1c54296d..c292a69845bb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_bang_bang.c
> > > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
> > > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> > > mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> > > instance->cdev->updated = false; /* cdev needs update
> > > */
> > > mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> > > + thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> > > @@ -98,17 +99,8 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
> > > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> > > */
> > > static int bang_bang_control(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int
> > > trip)
> > > {
> > > - struct thermal_instance *instance;
> > > -
> > > thermal_zone_trip_update(tz, trip);
> > >
> > > - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> > > -
> > > - list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
> > > - thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
> > > -
> > > - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> > > -
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> > > b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> > > index 2ae7198d3067..298eedac0293 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/step_wise.c
> > > @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
> > > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> > > mutex_lock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> > > instance->cdev->updated = false; /* cdev needs update
> > > */
> > > mutex_unlock(&instance->cdev->lock);
> > > + thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> > > @@ -185,20 +186,11 @@ static void thermal_zone_trip_update(struct
> > > thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> > > */
> > > static int step_wise_throttle(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> > > int
> > > trip)
> > > {
> > > - struct thermal_instance *instance;
> > > -
> > > thermal_zone_trip_update(tz, trip);
> > >
> > > if (tz->forced_passive)
> > > thermal_zone_trip_update(tz, THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE);
> > >
> > > - mutex_lock(&tz->lock);
> > > -
> > > - list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
> > > - thermal_cdev_update(instance->cdev);
> > > -
> > > - mutex_unlock(&tz->lock);
> > > -
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
>
>