Re: [RESEND][patch V3 06/23] bug: Annotate WARN/BUG/stackfail as noinstr safe

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Apr 02 2020 - 17:49:49 EST


Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 07:00:02PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h
>> @@ -70,13 +70,16 @@ do { \
>> #define HAVE_ARCH_BUG
>> #define BUG() \
>> do { \
>> + instr_begin(); \
>> _BUG_FLAGS(ASM_UD2, 0); \
>> unreachable(); \
>> } while (0)
>
> For visual symmetry at least, it seems like this wants an instr_end()
> before the unreachable(). Does objtool not like that?

There was some hickup, but can't remember. Will try to reproduce with
the latest version of Peter's objtool changes.

>> --- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
>> @@ -83,14 +83,19 @@ extern __printf(4, 5)
>> void warn_slowpath_fmt(const char *file, const int line, unsigned taint,
>> const char *fmt, ...);
>> #define __WARN() __WARN_printf(TAINT_WARN, NULL)
>> -#define __WARN_printf(taint, arg...) \
>> - warn_slowpath_fmt(__FILE__, __LINE__, taint, arg)
>> +#define __WARN_printf(taint, arg...) do { \
>> + instr_begin(); \
>> + warn_slowpath_fmt(__FILE__, __LINE__, taint, arg); \
>> + instr_end(); \
>> + while (0)
>
> Missing a '}' before the 'while'?

Yep, fixed that locally already.

Thanks,

tglx