Re: [tip: irq/core] irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Mon Mar 30 2020 - 05:19:38 EST


On 2020-03-30 10:12, Michal Simek wrote:
On 30. 03. 20 11:03, Michal Simek wrote:
On 30. 03. 20 10:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-03-30 09:32, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Thomas and Marc,

On 29. 03. 20 22:26, tip-bot2 for Michal Simek wrote:
The following commit has been merged into the irq/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:ÂÂÂÂ a0789993bf8266e62fea6b4613945ba081c71e7d
Gitweb:ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ
https://git.kernel.org/tip/a0789993bf8266e62fea6b4613945ba081c71e7d
Author:ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate:ÂÂÂ Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:25:59 +05:30
Committer:ÂÂÂÂ Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:52:53

irqchip/xilinx: Enable generic irq multi handler

Register default arch handler via driver instead of directly pointing to
xilinx intc controller. This patch makes architecture code more generic.

Driver calls generic domain specific irq handler which does the most of
things self. Also get rid of concurrent_irq counting which hasn't been
exported anywhere.
Based on this loop was also optimized by using do/while loop instead of
goto loop.

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-4-mubin.usman.sayyed@xxxxxxxxxx

---
Âarch/microblaze/KconfigÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ |Â 2 ++-
Âarch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h |Â 3 +---
Âarch/microblaze/kernel/irq.cÂÂÂÂÂ | 21 +-------------------
Âdrivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-------------
Â4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
index 6a331bd..242f58e 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/microblaze/Kconfig
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ config MICROBLAZE
ÂÂÂÂ select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
ÂÂÂÂ select MMU_GATHER_NO_RANGE if MMU
ÂÂÂÂ select SPARSE_IRQ
+ÂÂÂ select GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
+ÂÂÂ select HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ

Â# Endianness selection
Âchoice
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
index eac2fb4..5166f08 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -14,7 +14,4 @@
Âstruct pt_regs;
Âextern void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs);

-/* should be defined in each interrupt controller driver */
-extern unsigned int xintc_get_irq(void);
-
Â#endif /* _ASM_MICROBLAZE_IRQ_H */
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
index 903dad8..0b37dde 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/irq.c
@@ -20,29 +20,10 @@
Â#include <linux/irqchip.h>
Â#include <linux/of_irq.h>

-static u32 concurrent_irq;
-
Âvoid __irq_entry do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
Â{
-ÂÂÂ unsigned int irq;
-ÂÂÂ struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
ÂÂÂÂ trace_hardirqs_off();
-
-ÂÂÂ irq_enter();
-ÂÂÂ irq = xintc_get_irq();
-next_irq:
-ÂÂÂ BUG_ON(!irq);
-ÂÂÂ generic_handle_irq(irq);
-
-ÂÂÂ irq = xintc_get_irq();
-ÂÂÂ if (irq != -1U) {
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ pr_debug("next irq: %d\n", irq);
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ++concurrent_irq;
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ goto next_irq;
-ÂÂÂ }
-
-ÂÂÂ irq_exit();
-ÂÂÂ set_irq_regs(old_regs);
+ÂÂÂ handle_arch_irq(regs);
ÂÂÂÂ trace_hardirqs_on();
Â}

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
index 1d3d273..ea74181 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-xilinx-intc.c
@@ -124,20 +124,6 @@ static unsigned int xintc_get_irq_local(struct
xintc_irq_chip *irqc)
ÂÂÂÂ return irq;
Â}

-unsigned int xintc_get_irq(void)
-{
-ÂÂÂ unsigned int irq = -1;
-ÂÂÂ u32 hwirq;
-
-ÂÂÂ hwirq = xintc_read(primary_intc, IVR);
-ÂÂÂ if (hwirq != -1U)
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ irq = irq_find_mapping(primary_intc->root_domain, hwirq);
-
-ÂÂÂ pr_debug("irq-xilinx: hwirq=%d, irq=%d\n", hwirq, irq);
-
-ÂÂÂ return irq;
-}
-

One more thing. We could also get this function back and it will be fine
too. But up2you.

If you leave it up to me, I'll revert the whole series right now.

What I'd expect from you is to tell me exactly what is the minimal
change that keeps it working on both ARM, microblaze and PPC.
If it is a revert, tell me which patches to revert. if it is a patch
on top, send me the fix so that I can queue it now.

M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...