Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: x86: Move init-only kvm_x86_ops to separate struct

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 23/03/20 17:24, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Sounds cool! (not sure that with only two implementations people won't
> call it 'over-engineered' but cool). 

Yes, something like

#define KVM_X86_OP(name) .name = vmx_##name

(svm_##name for svm.c) and then

	KVM_X86_OP(check_nested_events)

etc.

> My personal wish would just be that
> function names in function implementations are not auto-generated so
> e.g. a simple 'git grep vmx_hardware_setup' works

Yes, absolutely; the function names would still be written by hand.

Paolo

> but the way how we
> fill vmx_x86_ops in can be macroed I guess.