Re: [PATCH v2 09/11] pstore/blk: blkoops: support special removing jobs for dmesg.

From: WeiXiong Liao
Date: Sun Mar 22 2020 - 09:04:08 EST


hi Kees Cook,

On 2020/3/19 AM 2:47, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 08:25:53PM +0800, WeiXiong Liao wrote:
>> It's one of a series of patches for adaptive to MTD device.
>>
>> MTD device is not block device. To write to flash device on MTD, erase
>> must to be done before. However, pstore/blk just set datalen as 0 when
>> remove, which is not enough for mtd device. That's why this patch here,
>> to support special jobs when removing pstore/blk record.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: WeiXiong Liao <liaoweixiong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-block.rst | 9 +++++++++
>> fs/pstore/blkoops.c | 4 +++-
>> fs/pstore/blkzone.c | 9 ++++++++-
>> include/linux/blkoops.h | 10 ++++++++++
>> include/linux/pstore_blk.h | 11 +++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-block.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-block.rst
>> index 299142b3d8e6..1735476621df 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-block.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/pstore-block.rst
>> @@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ negative number will be returned. The following return numbers mean more:
>> 1. -EBUSY: pstore/blk should try again later.
>> #. -ENEXT: this zone is used or broken, pstore/blk should try next one.
>>
>> +erase
>> +~~~~~
>> +
>> +It's generic erase API for pstore/blk, which is requested by non-block device.
>> +It will be called while pstore record is removing. It's required only when the
>> +device has special removing jobs. For example, MTD device tries to erase block.
>> +
>> +Normally zero should be returned, otherwise it indicates an error.
>> +
>> panic_write (for non-block device)
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/pstore/blkoops.c b/fs/pstore/blkoops.c
>> index 01170b344f00..7cf4731e52f7 100644
>> --- a/fs/pstore/blkoops.c
>> +++ b/fs/pstore/blkoops.c
>> @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ int blkoops_register_device(struct blkoops_device *bo_dev)
>> bzinfo->dump_oops = dump_oops;
>> bzinfo->read = bo_dev->read;
>> bzinfo->write = bo_dev->write;
>> + bzinfo->erase = bo_dev->erase;
>> bzinfo->panic_write = bo_dev->panic_write;
>> bzinfo->name = "blkoops";
>> bzinfo->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>> @@ -383,10 +384,11 @@ int blkoops_register_blkdev(unsigned int major, unsigned int flags,
>> bo_dev.total_size = blkoops_bdev_size(bdev);
>> if (bo_dev.total_size == 0)
>> goto err_put_bdev;
>> - bo_dev.panic_write = panic_write ? blkoops_blk_panic_write : NULL;
>> bo_dev.flags = flags;
>> bo_dev.read = blkoops_generic_blk_read;
>> bo_dev.write = blkoops_generic_blk_write;
>> + bo_dev.erase = NULL;
>> + bo_dev.panic_write = panic_write ? blkoops_blk_panic_write : NULL;
>>
>> ret = blkoops_register_device(&bo_dev);
>> if (ret)
>
> I think this patch, like the prior, needs to be reordered in the series.
> How about adding
>
> blkoops_register_device()
>
> as a single patch, which is what provides support for the "non-block"
> block devices? Then the blkoops_register_blkdev() can stand alone in the
> first patch?
>
> It just might be easier to review, since nothing uses
> blkoops_register_device() until the mtd driver is added. So that
> function and this patch would go together as a single "support non-block
> devices" change.
>

That's OK. I will do it.

>> diff --git a/fs/pstore/blkzone.c b/fs/pstore/blkzone.c
>> index 205aeff28992..a17fff77b875 100644
>> --- a/fs/pstore/blkzone.c
>> +++ b/fs/pstore/blkzone.c
>> @@ -593,11 +593,18 @@ static inline bool blkz_ok(struct blkz_zone *zone)
>> static inline int blkz_dmesg_erase(struct blkz_context *cxt,
>> struct blkz_zone *zone)
>> {
>> + size_t size;
>> +
>> if (unlikely(!blkz_ok(zone)))
>> return 0;
>>
>> atomic_set(&zone->buffer->datalen, 0);
>> - return blkz_zone_write(zone, FLUSH_META, NULL, 0, 0);
>> +
>> + size = buffer_datalen(zone) + sizeof(*zone->buffer);
>> + if (cxt->bzinfo->erase)
>> + return cxt->bzinfo->erase(size, zone->off);
>> + else
>> + return blkz_zone_write(zone, FLUSH_META, NULL, 0, 0);
>> }
>>
>> static inline int blkz_record_erase(struct blkz_context *cxt,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/blkoops.h b/include/linux/blkoops.h
>> index bc7665d14a98..11cb3036ad5f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/blkoops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/blkoops.h
>> @@ -33,6 +33,15 @@
>> * number means more:
>> * -EBUSY: pstore/blk should try again later.
>> * -ENEXT: this zone is used or broken, pstore/blk should try next one.
>> + * @erase:
>> + * The general (not panic) erase operation. It will be call while pstore
>> + * record is removing. It's required only when device have special
>> + * removing jobs, for example, MTD device try to erase block.
>> + *
>> + * Both of the @size and @offset parameters on this interface are
>> + * the relative size of the space provided, not the whole disk/flash.
>> + *
>> + * On success, 0 should be returned. Others mean error.
>> * @panic_write:
>> * The write operation only used for panic.
>> *
>> @@ -53,6 +62,7 @@ struct blkoops_device {
>> unsigned long total_size;
>> blkz_read_op read;
>> blkz_write_op write;
>> + blkz_erase_op erase;
>> blkz_write_op panic_write;
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pstore_blk.h b/include/linux/pstore_blk.h
>> index bbbe4fe37f7c..9641969f888f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pstore_blk.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pstore_blk.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,15 @@
>> * number means more:
>> * -EBUSY: pstore/blk should try again later.
>> * -ENEXT: this zone is used or broken, pstore/blk should try next one.
>> + * @erase:
>> + * The general (not panic) erase operation. It will be call while pstore
>> + * record is removing. It's required only when device have special
>> + * removing jobs, for example, MTD device try to erase block.
>> + *
>> + * Both of the @size and @offset parameters on this interface are
>> + * the relative size of the space provided, not the whole disk/flash.
>> + *
>> + * On success, 0 should be returned. Others mean error.
>> * @panic_write:
>> * The write operation only used for panic. It's optional if you do not
>> * care panic record. If panic occur but blkzone do not recover yet, the
>> @@ -59,6 +68,7 @@
>> */
>> typedef ssize_t (*blkz_read_op)(char *, size_t, loff_t);
>> typedef ssize_t (*blkz_write_op)(const char *, size_t, loff_t);
>> +typedef ssize_t (*blkz_erase_op)(size_t, loff_t);
>> struct blkz_info {
>> struct module *owner;
>> const char *name;
>> @@ -71,6 +81,7 @@ struct blkz_info {
>> int dump_oops;
>> blkz_read_op read;
>> blkz_write_op write;
>> + blkz_erase_op erase;
>> blkz_write_op panic_write;
>> };
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>

--
WeiXiong Liao