Re: [PATCH v12 8/8] MAINTAINERS: perf: Add pattern that matches ppc perf to the perf entry.

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 05:42:04PM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 07:42:03AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-03-20 at 14:42 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:23:38PM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:33:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:20:19AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > > > > > While at it also simplify the existing perf patterns.
> > > > > > And still missed fixes from parse-maintainers.pl.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Oh, that script UX is truly ingenious.
> > > > 
> > > > You have at least two options, their combinations, etc:
> > > >  - complain to the author :-)
> > > >  - send a patch :-)
> > > 
> > > Recently:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/4d5291fa3fb4962b1fa55e8fd9ef421ef0c1b1e5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > But why?
> > 
> > Shouldn't we rather run MAINTAINERS clean up once and require people to use
> > parse-maintainers.pl for good?
> 
> That cleanup did not happen yet, and I am not volunteering for one.
> The difference between MAINTAINERS and MAINTAINERS.new is:
> 
>  MAINTAINERS | 5510 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 2755 insertions(+), 2755 deletions(-)

Yes, it was basically reply to Joe.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko