Re: [PATCH] driver/perf: Add PMU driver for the ARM DMC-620 memory controller.

From: Will Deacon
Date: Fri Mar 20 2020 - 04:00:33 EST


On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:03:43PM -0700, Tuan Phan wrote:
> Please find my comments below.
>
> On Mar 19, 2020, at 8:16 AM, Mark Rutland <[1]mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> Hi Tuan,
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 05:29:38PM -0700, Tuan Phan wrote:
>
> DMC-620 PMU supports total 10 counters which each is
> independently programmable to different events and can
> be started and stopped individually.
>
> Looking at the TRM for DMC-620, the PMU registers are not in a separate
> frame from the other DMC control registers, and start at offset 0xA00
> (AKA 2560). I would generally expect that access to the DMC control
> registers was restricted to the secure world; is that not the case on
> your platform?
>
> I ask because if those are not restricted, the Normal world could
> potentially undermine the Secure world through this (e.g. playing with
> training settings, messing with the physical memory map, injecting RAS
> errors). Have you considered this?
>
> => Only PMU registers can be accessed within normal world. I only pass
> PMU registers (offset 0xA00) to kernel so shouldnât be problem.

Just a stylistic thing since there's been a bit of back-and-forth on this
patch, but please can you fix your email client configuration so that the
replies are threaded properly? '=>' is non-standard and it's pretty
hard to spot in a mass of C code. You can look at
Documentation/process/email-clients.rst for some information about
configuring common clients.

Apologies if this comes across as pedantic, but it makes a surprising
difference in how easy it is to keep up with the thread (at least to me).

Will