Re: [RFC v3 00/10] DDR/L3 Scaling support on SDM845 and SC7180 SoCs

[Rajendra Nayak]

On 3/19/2020 3:54 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19-03-20, 15:41, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > Viresh,
> > Saravana's example does show a device
> > with multiple opp tables but doesn't
> > need multiple opp table support to
> > land though (since it works fine with
> > the current implementation). I am more
> > interested  in understanding your/
> > Stephen's/Saravana's stance on adding
> > multiple opp-table support. Personally
> > I feel its inevitable, since multiple
> > qc drivers using interconnect opp-tables,
> > routinely need vote on multiple paths in
> > a non-trivial manner.
>
> The OPP core doesn't support multiple OPP tables for a device and I
> don't understand how it will. And so I have been waiting for a reply.

I thought this series indeed is proposing to add that support in OPP core?
a.k.a "[RFC v3 06/10] opp: Allow multiple opp_tables to be mapped to a single device"

> > > Could you please post a link to the discussion that you are referring to
> > > here?
> > > I looked at a few links posted in the cover letter as dependencies and
> > > it seems
> > > like the discussions are pending for *months* and not weeks but I
> > > might have looked
> > > at the wrong ones.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200114103448.odnvqawnqb3twst5@vireshk-i7/
> >
> > Rajendra,
> > Viresh is referring to ^^ one
>
> Right, thanks.

These discussions are stalled for over 2 months now waiting on a response from Saravana.
Viresh, whats the way forward here and how long do we plan on waiting for Saravanas response?


--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation