Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: host: Add UHS-II support in host layer

[Adrian Hunter]

On 9/01/20 11:14 am, Ben Chuang wrote:
> From: Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add UHS-II support in host layer

Split host layer changes from sdhci changes.

> 
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>

Drop "Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>"

> Signed-off-by: Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/Makefile                  |   1 +
>  drivers/mmc/host/{sdhci.c => sdhci-core.c} | 276 ++++++--
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-milbeaut.c          |   4 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c         |   4 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c           |   4 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c              |   2 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c          |   4 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav3.c             |   4 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.c              | 751 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.h              |  34 +
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon.c             |   4 +-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h                   | 284 +++++++-
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c             |   4 +-
>  include/linux/mmc/uhs2.h                   | 270 ++++++++
>  14 files changed, 1583 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>  rename drivers/mmc/host/{sdhci.c => sdhci-core.c} (94%)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.h
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mmc/uhs2.h

Please make sdhci-uhs2 a module and do not rename sdhci.c.

References in sdhci.c to sdhci-uhs2.c will need to be enclosed by
#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SDHCI_UHS2)

Move all UHS-II definitions into sdhci-uhs2.h.  Things that are for V4 but
not necessarily UHS-II can be in sdhci.h

Make the set_power parameter change into a separate patch

Fix all spelling mistakes

Make comment style correct.

Review all checkpatch warnings and checks (i.e. --strict option)

If possible provide a link to a tree that contains the patches.

Re-base on Ulf's next branch

The patch set could use an overview of how UHS-II is different from regular SD.

In other patches there are a bunch of memory allocations on the I/O path.
That is a problem.  Memory needed should be allocated in advance.