Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/metricgroup: Fix printing event names of metric group with multiple events incase of overlapping events

From: Jin, Yao
Date: Wed Jan 08 2020 - 02:25:34 EST




On 1/8/2020 2:58 PM, Kajol Jain wrote:
Commit f01642e4912b ("perf metricgroup: Support multiple
events for metricgroup") introduced support for multiple events
in a metric group. But with the current upstream, metric events
names are not printed properly incase we try to run multiple
metric groups with overlapping event.

With current upstream version, incase of overlapping metric events
issue is, we always start our comparision logic from start.
So, the events which already matched with some metric group also
take part in comparision logic. Because of that when we have overlapping
events, we end up matching current metric group event with already matched
one.

For example, in skylake machine we have metric event CoreIPC and
Instructions. Both of them need 'inst_retired.any' event value.
As events in Instructions is subset of events in CoreIPC, they
endup in pointing to same 'inst_retired.any' value.

In skylake platform:

command:# ./perf stat -M CoreIPC,Instructions -C 0 sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':

1,254,992,790 inst_retired.any # 1254992790.0
Instructions
# 1.3 CoreIPC
977,172,805 cycles
1,254,992,756 inst_retired.any

1.000802596 seconds time elapsed

command:# sudo ./perf stat -M UPI,IPC sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'sleep 1':

948,650 uops_retired.retire_slots
866,182 inst_retired.any # 0.7 IPC
866,182 inst_retired.any
1,175,671 cpu_clk_unhalted.thread

Patch fixes the issue by adding a static variable 'iterator_perf_evlist'
to keep track of events which already matched with some group. It points
to event in perf_evlist from where next match should start. Because we
need to make sure, we match correct set of events belongs to
corresponding metric group.

With this patch:
In skylake platform:

command:# ./perf stat -M CoreIPC,Instructions -C 0 sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':

149,481,533 inst_retired.any # 0.8 CoreIPC
186,244,218 cycles
149,479,362 inst_retired.any # 149479362.0
Instructions

1.001655885 seconds time elapsed

command:# ./perf stat -M UPI,IPC sleep 1
Performance counter stats for 'CPU(s) 0':

16,858,849 uops_retired.retire_slots # 1.3 UPI
12,529,178 inst_retired.any
12,529,558 inst_retired.any # 0.3 IPC
39,936,071 cpu_clk_unhalted.thread

1.001413978 seconds time elapsed


Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
index 35e151b8359b..58889b0496fb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
@@ -90,16 +90,21 @@ struct egroup {
const char *metric_unit;
};
+static int iterator_perf_evlist;
+
static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
const char **ids,
int idnum,
struct evsel **metric_events)
{
struct evsel *ev;
- int i = 0;
+ int i = 0, j = 0;
bool leader_found;
evlist__for_each_entry (perf_evlist, ev) {
+ j++;
+ if (j <= iterator_perf_evlist)
+ continue;
if (!strcmp(ev->name, ids[i])) {
if (!metric_events[i])
metric_events[i] = ev;
@@ -146,6 +151,7 @@ static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
}
}
}
+ iterator_perf_evlist = j;
return metric_events[0];
}


Thanks for reporting and fixing this issue.

I just have one question, do we really need a *static variable* to track the matched events? Perhaps using an input parameter?

Thanks
Jin Yao