Re: [PATCH 6/7] doc/RCU/rcu: Use https instead of http if possible

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon Jan 06 2020 - 13:35:45 EST


On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:59:51PM +0530, madhuparnabhowmik04@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx
>
> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi SeongJae,
>
> The patch looks fine, but I am not sure if this change is required.
> What do you think Paul?

Thank you, Madhuparna! This change might not be absolutely required,
but it is a good change.

SeongJae, could you please include Madhuparna's pair of Reviewed-by
tags and also make your email address consistent in your next posting?
You currently have both sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx and sjpark@xxxxxxxxxx
Either is fine. ;-)

Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> Madhuparna
>
> ---
> Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> index 2a830c51477e..0e03c6ef3147 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/rcu.rst
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ Frequently Asked Questions
> Of these, one was allowed to lapse by the assignee, and the
> others have been contributed to the Linux kernel under GPL.
> There are now also LGPL implementations of user-level RCU
> - available (http://liburcu.org/).
> + available (https://liburcu.org/).
>
> - I hear that RCU needs work in order to support realtime kernels?
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>