Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] ARM: OMAP2+: sleep43xx: Call secure suspend/resume handlers

From: Lokesh Vutla
Date: Tue Dec 31 2019 - 01:21:49 EST




On 31/12/19 12:20 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> During suspend CPU context may be lost in both non-secure and secure CPU
> states. The kernel can handle saving and restoring the non-secure context
> but must call into the secure side to allow it to save any context it may
> lose. Add these calls here.
>
> Note that on systems with OP-TEE available the suspend call is issued to
> OP-TEE using the ARM SMCCC, but the resume call is always issued to the
> ROM. This is because on waking from suspend the ROM is restored as the
> secure monitor. It is this resume call that instructs the ROM to restore
> OP-TEE, all subsequent calls will be handled by OP-TEE and should use the
> ARM SMCCC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h | 3 +++
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> index 736e594365f4..ba8c486c0454 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
> #define OMAP4_PPA_L2_POR_INDEX 0x23
> #define OMAP4_PPA_CPU_ACTRL_SMP_INDEX 0x25
>
> +#define AM43xx_PPA_SVC_PM_SUSPEND 0x71
> +#define AM43xx_PPA_SVC_PM_RESUME 0x72
> +
> /* Secure RX-51 PPA (Primary Protected Application) APIs */
> #define RX51_PPA_HWRNG 29
> #define RX51_PPA_L2_INVAL 40
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c
> index f11442ed3eff..4a564f676ff9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm33xx-core.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include "prm33xx.h"
> #include "soc.h"
> #include "sram.h"
> +#include "omap-secure.h"
>
> static struct powerdomain *cefuse_pwrdm, *gfx_pwrdm, *per_pwrdm, *mpu_pwrdm;
> static struct clockdomain *gfx_l4ls_clkdm;
> @@ -166,6 +167,16 @@ static int am43xx_suspend(unsigned int state, int (*fn)(unsigned long),
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> + /* Suspend secure side on HS devices */
> + if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP) {
> + if (optee_available)
> + omap_smccc_smc(AM43xx_PPA_SVC_PM_SUSPEND, 0);
> + else
> + omap_secure_dispatcher(AM43xx_PPA_SVC_PM_SUSPEND,
> + FLAG_START_CRITICAL,
> + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> + }
> +
> amx3_pre_suspend_common();
> scu_power_mode(scu_base, SCU_PM_POWEROFF);
> ret = cpu_suspend(args, fn);
> @@ -174,6 +185,12 @@ static int am43xx_suspend(unsigned int state, int (*fn)(unsigned long),
> if (!am43xx_check_off_mode_enable())
> amx3_post_suspend_common();
>
> + /* Resume secure side on HS devices */
> + if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
> + omap_secure_dispatcher(AM43xx_PPA_SVC_PM_RESUME,
> + FLAG_START_CRITICAL,
> + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);

Don't you need to check optee_available here?

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

> +
> return ret;
> }
>
>