Re: [PATCH] clk: Warn about critical clks that fail to enable

[Markus Elfring]

> If we don't warn here users of the CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag may not know
> that their clk isn't actually enabled because it silently fails to
> enable. Let's drop a big WARN_ON in that case so developers find these
> problems faster.

Would you like to avoid an extra warning for failures with non-critical clocks?


> I suspect that this may start warning for other users.

Will this software development concern trigger any further collateral evolution?

Regards,
Markus