Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] clk: meson: a1: add support for Amlogic A1 PLL clock driver

From: Martin Blumenstingl
Date: Fri Dec 27 2019 - 12:06:33 EST


Hi Jian,

On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 10:46 AM Jian Hu <jian.hu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "xtal_fixpll",
> + },
in the Meson8b and G12A (I assume it's the same on GXBB, I didn't
check it) we have a space between " clk_parent_data)" and "{"
this applies to at least one more occurrence below

[...]
> + /*
> + * This clock is used by APB bus which setted in Romcode
nit-pick: I'm not sure about the grammar here: setted -> "is set"?
and to make sure I understand this correctly: do you mean the "boot
ROM" with "Romcode"?

[...]
> +static int meson_a1_pll_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + const struct meson_eeclkc_data *data;
what do you need this "data" variable for?

> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct resource *res;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + struct regmap *map;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!data)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +
> + base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + if (IS_ERR(base))
> + return PTR_ERR(base);
> +
> + map = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &clkc_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(map))
> + return PTR_ERR(map);
> +
> + /* Populate regmap for the regmap backed clocks */
> + for (i = 0; i < data->regmap_clk_num; i++)
> + data->regmap_clks[i]->map = map;
why can't we use a1_pll_regmaps directly here?

> +
> + for (i = 0; i < data->hw_onecell_data->num; i++) {
> + /* array might be sparse */
> + if (!data->hw_onecell_data->hws[i])
> + continue;
> +
> + ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, data->hw_onecell_data->hws[i]);
and why can't we use a1_pll_hw_onecell_data directly here?

[...]
> +static const struct meson_eeclkc_data a1_pll_data = {
> + .regmap_clks = a1_pll_regmaps,
> + .regmap_clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(a1_pll_regmaps),
> + .hw_onecell_data = &a1_pll_hw_onecell_data,
> +};
if _probe would access these directly then you can drop meson_eeclkc_data
that is a good thing in my opinion because I was confused by the
"eeclk" since the patch description says that there's no EE or AO
domain on the A1 SoCs


Martin