[PATCH 4.19 217/321] PCI/MSI: Return -ENOSPC from pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity()

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Tue Dec 03 2019 - 18:01:23 EST


From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 77f88abd4a6f73a1a68dbdc0e3f21575fd508fc3 ]

The API of pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity() says it returns -ENOSPC if
fewer than @min_vecs interrupt vectors are available for @dev.

However, if a device supports MSI-X but not MSI and a caller requests
@min_vecs that can't be satisfied by MSI-X, we previously returned -EINVAL
(from the failed attempt to enable MSI), not -ENOSPC.

When -ENOSPC is returned, callers may reduce the number IRQs they request
and try again. Most callers can use the @min_vecs and @max_vecs
parameters to avoid this retry loop, but that doesn't work when using IRQ
affinity "nr_sets" because rebalancing the sets is driver-specific.

This return value bug has been present since pci_alloc_irq_vectors() was
added in v4.10 by aff171641d18 ("PCI: Provide sensible IRQ vector
alloc/free routines"), but it wasn't an issue because @min_vecs/@max_vecs
removed the need for callers to iteratively reduce the number of IRQs
requested and retry the allocation, so they didn't need to distinguish
-ENOSPC from -EINVAL.

In v5.0, 6da4b3ab9a6e ("genirq/affinity: Add support for allocating
interrupt sets") added IRQ sets to the interface, which reintroduced the
need to check for -ENOSPC and possibly reduce the number of IRQs requested
and retry the allocation.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pci/msi.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
index af24ed50a2452..971dddf62374f 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
@@ -1155,7 +1155,8 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
const struct irq_affinity *affd)
{
static const struct irq_affinity msi_default_affd;
- int vecs = -ENOSPC;
+ int msix_vecs = -ENOSPC;
+ int msi_vecs = -ENOSPC;

if (flags & PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY) {
if (!affd)
@@ -1166,16 +1167,17 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
}

if (flags & PCI_IRQ_MSIX) {
- vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, NULL, min_vecs, max_vecs,
- affd);
- if (vecs > 0)
- return vecs;
+ msix_vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, NULL, min_vecs,
+ max_vecs, affd);
+ if (msix_vecs > 0)
+ return msix_vecs;
}

if (flags & PCI_IRQ_MSI) {
- vecs = __pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs, affd);
- if (vecs > 0)
- return vecs;
+ msi_vecs = __pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs,
+ affd);
+ if (msi_vecs > 0)
+ return msi_vecs;
}

/* use legacy irq if allowed */
@@ -1186,7 +1188,9 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs,
}
}

- return vecs;
+ if (msix_vecs == -ENOSPC)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ return msi_vecs;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity);

--
2.20.1