Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: bcm-kona: use platform_irq_count

From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Tue Dec 03 2019 - 01:58:04 EST


On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:04:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> Use platform_irq_count to replace of_irq_count
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> V1:
> Code inspection, not tested
>
> drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> index 4122683eb1f9..c50721980a7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-bcm-kona.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> -#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> @@ -586,7 +585,7 @@ static int bcm_kona_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> kona_gpio->gpio_chip = template_chip;
> chip = &kona_gpio->gpio_chip;
> - kona_gpio->num_bank = of_irq_count(dev->of_node);
> + kona_gpio->num_bank = platform_irq_count(pdev);

of_irq_count returns 0 or a positive int while platform_irq_count might
return a negative error code. This needs handling. Also I wonder why
platform_irq_count() is better than of_irq_count() which would be good
to describe in the commit log.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |