Re: [PATCH v2] export.h: reduce __ksymtab_strings string duplication by using "MS" section flags
From: Matthias Maennich
Date: Tue Nov 26 2019 - 08:56:27 EST
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 05:32:59PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:42 AM Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Commit c3a6cf19e695 ("export: avoid code duplication in
include/linux/export.h") refactors export.h quite nicely, but introduces
a slight increase in memory usage due to using the empty string ""
instead of NULL to indicate that an exported symbol has no namespace. As
mentioned in that commit, this meant an increase of 1 byte per exported
symbol without a namespace. For example, if a kernel configuration has
about 10k exported symbols, this would mean that the size of
__ksymtab_strings would increase by roughly 10kB.
We can alleviate this situation by utilizing the SHF_MERGE and
SHF_STRING section flags. SHF_MERGE|SHF_STRING indicate to the linker
that the data in the section are null-terminated strings that can be
merged to eliminate duplication. More specifically, from the binutils
documentation - "for sections with both M and S, a string which is a
suffix of a larger string is considered a duplicate. Thus "def" will be
merged with "abcdef"; A reference to the first "def" will be changed to
a reference to "abcdef"+3". Thus, all the empty strings would be merged
as well as any strings that can be merged according to the cited method
above. For example, "memset" and "__memset" would be merged to just
"__memset" in __ksymtab_strings.
As of v5.4-rc5, the following statistics were gathered with x86
defconfig with approximately 10.7k exported symbols.
Size of __ksymtab_strings in vmlinux:
-------------------------------------
v5.4-rc5: 213834 bytes
v5.4-rc5 with commit c3a6cf19e695: 224455 bytes
v5.4-rc5 with this patch: 205759 bytes
So, we already see memory savings of ~8kB compared to vanilla -rc5 and
savings of nearly 18.7kB compared to -rc5 with commit c3a6cf19e695 on top.
Unfortunately, as of this writing, strings will not get deduplicated for
kernel modules, as ld does not do the deduplication for
SHF_MERGE|SHF_STRINGS sections for relocatable files (ld -r), which
kernel modules are. A patch for ld is currently being worked on to
hopefully allow for string deduplication in relocatable files in the
future.
Thanks for working on this!
Suggested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: use %progbits throughout and document the oddity in a comment.
include/asm-generic/export.h | 8 +++++---
include/linux/export.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/export.h b/include/asm-generic/export.h
index fa577978fbbd..23bc98e97a66 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/export.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/export.h
@@ -26,9 +26,11 @@
.endm
/*
- * note on .section use: @progbits vs %progbits nastiness doesn't matter,
- * since we immediately emit into those sections anyway.
+ * note on .section use: we specify progbits since usage of the "M" (SHF_MERGE)
+ * section flag requires it. Use '%progbits' instead of '@progbits' since the
+ * former apparently works on all arches according to the binutils source.
*/
+
.macro ___EXPORT_SYMBOL name,val,sec
#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
.globl __ksymtab_\name
@@ -37,7 +39,7 @@
__ksymtab_\name:
__put \val, __kstrtab_\name
.previous
- .section __ksymtab_strings,"a"
+ .section __ksymtab_strings,"aMS",%progbits,1
__kstrtab_\name:
.asciz "\name"
.previous
diff --git a/include/linux/export.h b/include/linux/export.h
index 201262793369..3d835ca34d33 100644
--- a/include/linux/export.h
+++ b/include/linux/export.h
@@ -81,16 +81,31 @@ struct kernel_symbol {
#else
+/*
+ * note on .section use: we specify progbits since usage of the "M" (SHF_MERGE)
+ * section flag requires it. Use '%progbits' instead of '@progbits' since the
+ * former apparently works on all arches according to the binutils source.
+ */
+#define __KSTRTAB_ENTRY(sym) \
+ asm(" .section \"__ksymtab_strings\",\"aMS\",%progbits,1 \n" \
+ "__kstrtab_" #sym ": \n" \
+ " .asciz \"" #sym "\" \n" \
+ " .previous \n")
+
+#define __KSTRTAB_NS_ENTRY(sym, ns) \
+ asm(" .section \"__ksymtab_strings\",\"aMS\",%progbits,1 \n" \
+ "__kstrtabns_" #sym ": \n" \
+ " .asciz " #ns " \n" \
Hmm, it took some time for me to how this code works.
ns is already a C string, then you added # to it,
then I was confused.
Personally, I prefer this code:
" .asciz \"" ns "\" \n"
so it looks in the same way as __KSTRTAB_ENTRY().
I agree with this, these entries should be consistent.
BTW, you duplicated \"aMS\",%progbits,1" and ".previous"
I would write it shorter, like this:
#define ___EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym, sec, ns) \
extern typeof(sym) sym; \
extern const char __kstrtab_##sym[]; \
extern const char __kstrtabns_##sym[]; \
__CRC_SYMBOL(sym, sec); \
asm(" .section \"__ksymtab_strings\",\"aMS\",%progbits,1\n" \
"__kstrtab_" #sym ": \n" \
" .asciz \"" #sym "\" \n" \
"__kstrtabns_" #sym ": \n" \
" .asciz \"" ns "\" \n" \
" .previous \n"); \
__KSYMTAB_ENTRY(sym, sec)
I would prefer the separate macros though (as initially proposed) as I
find them much more readable. The code is already a bit tricky to reason
about and I don't think the shorter version is enough of a gain.
+ " .previous \n")
+
/* For every exported symbol, place a struct in the __ksymtab section */
#define ___EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym, sec, ns) \
extern typeof(sym) sym; \
+ extern const char __kstrtab_##sym[]; \
+ extern const char __kstrtabns_##sym[]; \
__CRC_SYMBOL(sym, sec); \
- static const char __kstrtab_##sym[] \
- __attribute__((section("__ksymtab_strings"), used, aligned(1))) \
- = #sym; \
You could keep simplified versions of these statements as comment for
the above macros to increase readability.
- static const char __kstrtabns_##sym[] \
- __attribute__((section("__ksymtab_strings"), used, aligned(1))) \
- = ns; \
+ __KSTRTAB_ENTRY(sym); \
+ __KSTRTAB_NS_ENTRY(sym, ns); \
__KSYMTAB_ENTRY(sym, sec)
#endif
--
2.16.4
With the above addressed, please feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Matthias Maennich <maennich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Matthias
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada