[BUGFIX PATCH 4/4] perf probe: Skip overlapped location on searching variables

From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Wed Oct 30 2019 - 03:09:56 EST


Since debuginfo__find_probes() callback function can be called
with the location which already passed, the callback function
must filter out such overlapped locations.

add_probe_trace_event() has already done it by commit 1a375ae7659a
("perf probe: Skip same probe address for a given line"), but
add_available_vars() doesn't. Thus perf probe -v shows same address
repeatedly as below.

# perf probe -V vfs_read:18
Available variables at vfs_read:18
@<vfs_read+217>
char* buf
loff_t* pos
ssize_t ret
struct file* file
@<vfs_read+217>
char* buf
loff_t* pos
ssize_t ret
struct file* file
@<vfs_read+226>
char* buf
loff_t* pos
ssize_t ret
struct file* file


With this fix, perf probe -V shows it correctly.
# perf probe -V vfs_read:18
Available variables at vfs_read:18
@<vfs_read+217>
char* buf
loff_t* pos
ssize_t ret
struct file* file
@<vfs_read+226>
char* buf
loff_t* pos
ssize_t ret
struct file* file

Fixes: cf6eb489e5c0 ("perf probe: Show accessible local variables")
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index 88e17a4f5ac3..f441e0174334 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1413,6 +1413,18 @@ static int collect_variables_cb(Dwarf_Die *die_mem, void *data)
return DIE_FIND_CB_END;
}

+static bool available_var_finder_overlap(struct available_var_finder *af)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < af->nvls; i++) {
+ if (af->pf.addr == af->vls[i].point.address)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+
+}
+
/* Add a found vars into available variables list */
static int add_available_vars(Dwarf_Die *sc_die, struct probe_finder *pf)
{
@@ -1423,6 +1435,14 @@ static int add_available_vars(Dwarf_Die *sc_die, struct probe_finder *pf)
Dwarf_Die die_mem;
int ret;

+ /*
+ * For some reason (e.g. different column assigned to same address),
+ * this callback can be called with the address which already passed.
+ * Ignore it first.
+ */
+ if (available_var_finder_overlap(af))
+ return 0;
+
/* Check number of tevs */
if (af->nvls == af->max_vls) {
pr_warning("Too many( > %d) probe point found.\n", af->max_vls);