Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: memcontrol: remove mem_cgroup_select_victim_node()

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Oct 29 2019 - 20:47:52 EST


On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:47:53 -0700 Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Since commit 1ba6fc9af35b ("mm: vmscan: do not share cgroup iteration
> between reclaimers"), the memcg reclaim does not bail out earlier based
> on sc->nr_reclaimed and will traverse all the nodes. All the reclaimable
> pages of the memcg on all the nodes will be scanned relative to the
> reclaim priority. So, there is no need to maintain state regarding which
> node to start the memcg reclaim from. Also KCSAN complains data races in
> the code maintaining the state.
>
> This patch effectively reverts the commit 889976dbcb12 ("memcg: reclaim
> memory from nodes in round-robin order") and the commit 453a9bf347f1
> ("memcg: fix numa scan information update to be triggered by memory
> event").
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: <syzbot+13f93c99c06988391efe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The sysbot report
(http://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000055aba7058af4d378@xxxxxxxxxx) was
for a null pointer deref. So won't we be needing a Fixes: and cc:stable?