Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops

[Baolin Wang]

Hi Adrian,

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:20, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 22/10/19 8:58 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops as a preparation in case some
> > host controllers have different method to complete one request, such as
> > supporting request completion of MMC software queue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |   12 ++++++++++--
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h |    2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > index b056400..850241f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > @@ -2729,7 +2729,10 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host)
> >
> >       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> >
> > -     mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
> > +     if (host->ops->request_done)
> > +             host->ops->request_done(host, mrq);
>
> For hsq, couldn't this result in sdhci_request() being called interrupt
> context here.

Right, now it did not support.

>
> To prevent that you would need to add a condition to sdhci_defer_done() so
> it always defers when using hsq.

Yes, but now the condition can be matched in sdhci_defer_done()  when
using hsq. So no need to worry that the sdhci_request() will be called
in interrupt
context in this patch set. Thanks.

-- 
Baolin Wang
Best Regards