Re: [PATCH] PNP: fix unintended sign extension on left shifts

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri Oct 18 2019 - 06:15:29 EST


On Monday, October 14, 2019 3:16:08 PM CEST Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Shifting a u8 left will cause the value to be promoted to an integer. If
> the top bit of the u8 is set then the following conversion to a 64 bit
> resource_size_t will sign extend the value causing the upper 32 bits
> to be set in the result.
>
> Fix this by casting the u8 value to a resource_size_t before the shift.
> Original commit is pre-git history.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c b/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> index 179b737280e1..c947b1673041 100644
> --- a/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pnp/isapnp/core.c
> @@ -511,10 +511,14 @@ static void __init isapnp_parse_mem32_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev,
> unsigned char flags;
>
> isapnp_peek(tmp, size);
> - min = (tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) | (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> - max = (tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) | (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
> - align = (tmp[12] << 24) | (tmp[11] << 16) | (tmp[10] << 8) | tmp[9];
> - len = (tmp[16] << 24) | (tmp[15] << 16) | (tmp[14] << 8) | tmp[13];
> + min = ((resource_size_t)tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) |
> + (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> + max = ((resource_size_t)tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) |
> + (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
> + align = ((resource_size_t)tmp[12] << 24) | (tmp[11] << 16) |
> + (tmp[10] << 8) | tmp[9];
> + len = ((resource_size_t)tmp[16] << 24) | (tmp[15] << 16) |
> + (tmp[14] << 8) | tmp[13];
> flags = tmp[0];
> pnp_register_mem_resource(dev, option_flags,
> min, max, align, len, flags);
> @@ -532,8 +536,10 @@ static void __init isapnp_parse_fixed_mem32_resource(struct pnp_dev *dev,
> unsigned char flags;
>
> isapnp_peek(tmp, size);
> - base = (tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) | (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> - len = (tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) | (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
> + base = ((resource_size_t)tmp[4] << 24) | (tmp[3] << 16) |
> + (tmp[2] << 8) | tmp[1];
> + len = ((resource_size_t)tmp[8] << 24) | (tmp[7] << 16) |
> + (tmp[6] << 8) | tmp[5];
> flags = tmp[0];
> pnp_register_mem_resource(dev, option_flags, base, base, 0, len, flags);
> }
>

Can you please respin this with a CC to linux-acpi?