Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: merge arm_big_little and vexpress-spc

[Sudeep Holla]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:00:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-10-19, 10:26, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 08:09:36AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 16-10-19, 12:03, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > arm_big_little cpufreq driver was designed as a generic big little
> > > > driver that could be used by any platform and make use of bL switcher.
> > > > Over years alternate solutions have be designed and merged to deal with
> > > > bL/HMP systems like EAS.
> > > >
> > > > Also since no other driver made use of generic arm_big_little cpufreq
> > > > driver except Vexpress SPC, we can merge them together as vexpress-spc
> > > > driver used only on Vexpress TC2(CA15_CA7) platform.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  MAINTAINERS                            |   5 +-
> > > >  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm            |  12 +-
> > > >  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile               |   2 -
> > > >  drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c       | 658 ------------------------
> > > >  drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.h       |  43 --
> > > >  drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 661 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  6 files changed, 652 insertions(+), 729 deletions(-)
> > > >  delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c
> > > >  delete mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.h
> > >
> > > The delta produced here is enormous probably because you copy/pasted things. I
> > > am wondering if using git mv to rename arm_big_little.c and then move spc bits
> > > into it will make this delta smaller to review ?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I did a quick try but slightly different order. As I need the final
> > driver to be vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c, I am thinking of first merging
> > vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c into arm_big_little.c and then renaming it back
> > later. Does that sound good ?
>
> Maybe git can produce short diff even if you do this in a single patch. But two
> would be fine if that makes me review lesss stuff :)
>

You are right, I was so sure that -M is the option and got convinced
that it's not working for this change, but what I needed was -B for
format-patch. Thanks for reminding again and making me look harder ;)

--
Regards,
Sudeep