Re: [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] devfreq: exynos-bus: Clean up code

[Artur ÅwigoÅ]

Hi,

On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 11:22 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Artur,
> 
> On 19. 9. 19. ìí 11:22, Artur ÅwigoÅ wrote:
> > From: Artur ÅwigoÅ <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This patch adds minor improvements to the exynos-bus driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Artur ÅwigoÅ <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 66 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > index 60ad4319fd80..8d44810cac69 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > @@ -15,11 +15,10 @@
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/export.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > -#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> > -#include <linux/slab.h>
> >  
> >  #define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO	40
> >  
> > @@ -178,7 +177,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> >  	struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> >  	struct opp_table *opp_table;
> >  	const char *vdd = "vdd";
> > -	int i, ret, count, size;
> > +	int i, ret, count;
> >  
> >  	opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &vdd, 1);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(opp_table)) {
> > @@ -201,8 +200,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> >  	}
> >  	bus->edev_count = count;
> >  
> > -	size = sizeof(*bus->edev) * count;
> > -	bus->edev = devm_kzalloc(dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	bus->edev = devm_kcalloc(dev, count, sizeof(*bus->edev), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!bus->edev) {
> >  		ret = -ENOMEM;
> >  		goto err_regulator;
> > @@ -301,10 +299,9 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> >  	profile->exit = exynos_bus_exit;
> >  
> >  	ondemand_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ondemand_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!ondemand_data) {
> > -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -		goto err;
> > -	}
> > +	if (!ondemand_data)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> >  	ondemand_data->upthreshold = 40;
> >  	ondemand_data->downdifferential = 5;
> >  
> > @@ -314,8 +311,7 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> >  						ondemand_data);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(bus->devfreq)) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "failed to add devfreq device\n");
> > -		ret = PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> > -		goto err;
> > +		return PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	/*
> > @@ -325,16 +321,13 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> >  	ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "failed to enable devfreq-event devices\n");
> > -		goto err;
> > +		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ret = exynos_bus_set_event(bus);
> > -	if (ret < 0) {
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> >  		dev_err(dev, "failed to set event to devfreq-event devices\n");
> > -		goto err;
> 
> Instead of removing 'goto err', just return err as I commented[1] on v1.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/26/331
> 
> > -	}
> >  
> > -err:
> >  	return ret;
> 
> And you just keep 'return ret' or you can change it as 'return 0'.

OK, I went for:

ret = exynos_bus_set_event(bus);
if (ret < 0) {
	dev_err(dev, "failed to set event to devfreq-event devices\n");
	return ret;
}

return 0;

> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -344,7 +337,6 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> >  	struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> >  	struct devfreq_passive_data *passive_data;
> >  	struct devfreq *parent_devfreq;
> > -	int ret = 0;
> >  
> >  	/* Initialize the struct profile and governor data for passive device */
> >  	profile->target = exynos_bus_target;
> > @@ -352,30 +344,26 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> >  
> >  	/* Get the instance of parent devfreq device */
> >  	parent_devfreq = devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(dev, 0);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(parent_devfreq)) {
> > -		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > -		goto err;
> > -	}
> > +	if (IS_ERR(parent_devfreq))
> > +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >  
> >  	passive_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*passive_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!passive_data) {
> > -		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > -		goto err;
> > -	}
> > +	if (!passive_data)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> >  	passive_data->parent = parent_devfreq;
> >  
> >  	/* Add devfreq device for exynos bus with passive governor */
> > -	bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile, DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE,
> > +	bus->devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(dev, profile,
> > +						DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE,
> >  						passive_data);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(bus->devfreq)) {
> >  		dev_err(dev,
> >  			"failed to add devfreq dev with passive governor\n");
> > -		ret = PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> > -		goto err;
> > +		return PTR_ERR(bus->devfreq);
> >  	}
> >  
> > -err:
> > -	return ret;
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > @@ -393,18 +381,18 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	bus = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	bus = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bus), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!bus)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  	mutex_init(&bus->lock);
> > -	bus->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	bus->dev = dev;
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bus);
> >  
> >  	profile = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*profile), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (!profile)
> >  		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> > -	node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "devfreq", 0);
> > +	node = of_parse_phandle(np, "devfreq", 0);
> >  	if (node) {
> >  		of_node_put(node);
> >  		passive = true;
> > @@ -461,12 +449,10 @@ static int exynos_bus_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
> > -	if (ret < 0) {
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> >  		dev_err(dev, "failed to enable the devfreq-event devices\n");
> > -		return ret;
> 
> Keep the 'return ret' if error happen as I commented[1] on v1.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/26/331
> 
> > -	}
> >  
> > -	return 0;
> > +	return ret;
> 
> And you just keep 'return 0' or you can change it as 'return ret'.

OK, I kept the original code:

ret = exynos_bus_enable_edev(bus);
if (ret < 0) {
	dev_err(dev, "failed to enable the devfreq-event devices\n");
	return ret;
}

return 0;

> >  }
> >  
> >  static int exynos_bus_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > @@ -475,12 +461,10 @@ static int exynos_bus_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = exynos_bus_disable_edev(bus);
> > -	if (ret < 0) {
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> >  		dev_err(dev, "failed to disable the devfreq-event devices\n");
> > -		return ret;
> 
> Keep the 'return ret' if error happen as I commented[1] on v1.
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/26/331

OK, I kept the original code.

> > -	}
> >  
> > -	return 0;
> > +	return ret;
> 
> And you just keep 'return 0' or you can change it as 'return ret'.
> 
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > 
> 
> 

Best regards,
-- 
Artur ÅwigoÅ
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics